Desert Pearl A British Fraud 13

Legal Ombudsman first priority had to be to clear the cases which had built up.

No justice for the victims of Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd. SRA assist LO when requested but legal firm cannot be contacted but eventually submits a small proportion of information late to the investigation. This small proportion of information is a judged to be significant enough to rule in the firms favor. All conclusive evidence submitted by the complaint ant is ruled out side of time.

Although the complaint ants submit their evidence before the legal firm to the investigation they are exposed by LO priority. Legal firm LAWL withholds/hides quite a number of sensitive documentation that exposes the firms poor behavior. However the LO priority is not acquire the sensitive documentation, in the name of justice, first priority is to remove the build up of cases.

LO rules in legal firms favour and apportions blame on the victims. The investigation of 29th March 2012 is a waste of time and the applet process was further hampered when the investigator Mr Kate Dicicco / Lunn is no longer available to address her findings or report on why she removed said documentation most notable Denton Wilde Sapte Report of June 2009 a due diligence which accounted for conclusive evidence the legal firm had mislead their client.

The Legal firms contract of 8th May 2008 was exposed by Denton Report which reported a mortgage had been established on the land known as Desert Pearl One, in Hurghada Egypt. Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd contract of 8th of May was exposed, as DP1 was not freehold as the firm had claimed in their initial introduction to their clients the Mc Loughlin.

Legal Ombudsman removes Denton form their investigation of 29th March 2012 and still refuse to confirm to this day that a mortgage exists on the land known as Desert Pearl One with the Bank of Abu Dhabi in London. Legal Ombudsman is well aware he and he alone is responsible for his actions. British authorities such as the Solicitor Regulatory Authority also refuse to adhere to the request.

The Irish clients become victims for a second time.

To lodge a complaint contact: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk

Desert Pearl A British Fraud 12

Legal Ombudsman requires the assist of the SRA.

SRA’s reluctance to provide information in instances where lawyers’ firms had either closed or been subject to intervention.

To lodge a complaint contact: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk

Desert Pearl A British Fraud 11

Legal Ombudsman of the UK support Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd as opposed to accepting the true facts why the firm refused to communicate with their clients. The Irish clients are exposed to server harm by both the firm and the LO.

Solicitor Regulatory Authority refuse to act.

To lodge a complaint contact: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk

Desert Pearl A British Fraud 10

£3.9 million is apparently forwarded to WWD Egyptian.

No formal relationship is established between WWD-UK and

WWD-Egypt. Monies goes missing.

Legal Ombudsman of the UK ignores information forwarded rules submissions out of time. Solicitor Regulatory Authority show no concern.

To lodge a complaint contact: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk

Desert Pearl A British Fraud 9

Jane Graig of Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd (LAWL) states the legal firm forwarded their clients monies to WWD (Worldwide Destinations Ltd).

Legal Ombudsman of the UK obtains bank details from ledger of LAWL, in their so called re- investigation of 2017, that outlining the legal firm money handling affairs. LAWL forwards clients monies to company know as Desert Pearl Resort Ltd, through Llyods TSB account in Birmingham UK. Legal Ombudsman of the UK support legal firms but is aware that solicitor has mishandled their clients monies. LO hides sensitive information by ruling clients conclusive evidence outside of time for the second time. The LO had already investigated on the 29th March 2012. What is quite misleading is the fact that no details were ever presented by the legal firm to the LO in their investigation around banking details. This information is forwarded by the Irish clients in 2017, on foot of note a new investigation is to be undertaken by the LO office. The clients informed the LO that the legal firm had withheld sensitive information in 2012 from the investigation.This include the legal firms banking details. LO refuses to assist the complainant again in 2017 and no reinvestigation ever takes place. The LO uses the guise of reinvestigation as arouse to obtain information from the Irish citizens to discredit. The LO is apparently a fair and independent body but acts to protect the legal firm at all costs. The legal firm have carried out an illegal act under UK law.

Solicitor Regulatory Authority UK refuses to act.

To lodge a complaint contact: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk

Desert Pearl A British Fraud 8

By December 2009 I had successfully negotiated a possible solution with ER and in respect of DP1 the Abu Dhabi bank. Please note: Mr Philip Morris of Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd refused to present any information in the Legal Ombudsman investigation of the 29th March 2012, dealing with the Bank of Abu Dhabi or neither did he state a mortgage existed on Desert Pearl One land.

A mortgage of 25 million Egyptian pounds was drawn down on DP1 in favor of the Bank of Abu Dhabi. In the contract of 8th May 2008 the legal firm (LAWL) forwards their clients contracts stating the a due diligence was under take and development DP1 was Freehold.

The Legal Ombudsman and Solicitor Regulatory Authority UK support the legal firms contract ruling in the firms favor. The Legal Ombudsman refuses to deal with the land question but suggest the Irish client's pay further monies for copy of the due diligence. The Legal Ombudsman of Uk also refuses to accept the Denton Wilde Spate Report of June 2009 outlining the fact that a mortgage exists on DP1.

Below we see:

Para 1 - My firm did not do the first due diligence checks on ER projects. There were other due diligence checks carried out by other lawyers well before any buyer instructed my firm. My firm carried out its due diligence on the DP1 in March 2008 by which time most of the apartments on that development- had already been sold.- My firm's due diligence was not carried out for ER it was carried out for clients.

(1) Due Diligence report was apparently undertaken in March 2008. For many clients Egypt in 2008 was not technological friendly all land registry documentation was held in paper archives throughout Egypt. Therefore it is quite a stretch of ones imagination to believe all conveyance document were obtained and analysis in seven weeks to allow the Irish clients purchase their apt in early May 2008.

(2) The legal firm claim that the undertook the due diligence not for clients of ER (El Riad) but for their own company client. What is quite astonishing is that at the central to the Legal Ombudsman investigation 2011-12 the legal firm refuses to present a copy of the clients due diligence to them. The legal firm claims the due diligence is their property. The legal received all it fees therefore the client had already purchased the due diligence report but were denied the information. The Legal Ombudsman UK supports the legal firm claiming they had undertook the study before the Irish client had commenced purchasing their property on DP1. One of the Legal Ombudsman UK recommendations is the Irish client contribute to the legal firms cost for undertaken the study. Here the Irish clients are refused their due diligence and are insulted by the Ombudsman that they contribute to the firms purse, yet the legal firm can not account for large sum of monies had gone that was forwarded to the legal firm. The Legal Ombudsman shows pure prejudice and refuses to assist the Irish client on this matter.

Solicitor Regulatory Authority refuse to act.

To lodge a complaint contact: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk

Desert Pearl A British Fraud 7

Posted tagged ‘phil morris andrew harris PHW property hotspots worldwide LAW’

« Badbusinessinegypt’s Blog home page

Story of an Investor Getting Scammed by Andrew and Alison Harris PHW Hurghada, Egypt

2008

The purpose of this website is warn anyone who wishes to invest money in Property Hotspots Worldwide is NOT to. I have experienced it and would NOT want anyone else to go through the same.

http://property-notspots-worldwide.com/

Unfortunately, I had the experience of dealing with Alison and Andrew (Andy) Harris at Regency Towers, Hurghada, Egypt where they were close to completing (so I thought at the time) a small development of 1 and 2 bedroom apartments.

Having inspected the apartment, we were told by Alison that we could have certain extras in the apartment and change the specification free of charge, (I,e. put a balustrade outside the apartment and change the position of an external door). We came back to the UK and paid a deposit of £2,050.

We then dealt with a director of their UK company called Mike, who left after a short while and were told by Alison that he had been sacked for using drugs and was drinking on the job(great combination in business!) and began dealing with Andy. That’s when it all went wrong. Andy told us point blank everything Alison had told us we could have we couldn’t and that Alison had never said that – A complete lie.

Although not happy about the situation, we felt it worth progressing as we had already paid the deposit. How wrong were we.

The solicitor who was recommended to us by Property Hotspots’s estate agents who sold me the apartment, Philip Morris, we subsequently found out was particularly friendly with Andy Harris and a contract was sent to us to sign without having seen it. Who would sign a contract that had never been seen or amended and my solicitor didn’t have any amendments or comments about the contract which we found very strange!! Andy was not happy that we would not sign the contract without having read it!

We agreed certain additional works in the apartment which I would have to pay an additional amount (housing the boiler/wardrobe/bathroom cabinet) and this specification was attached to the contract as part of the contract so the works had to be completed before we could complete.

We exchanged contracts and then the rude abrupt emails started from Andy Harris saying he wanted to complete. He sent a few photographs of the apartment which showed the specification we had agreed and annexed to the contract had not been completed so we said we would not part with the rest of the money until they had.

All Andy Harris could say was “It’s got a 2 year warranty for any works so they will be done – I want your money its with your solicitor“.

After lots (and I mean lots) of emails to my solicitor who hardly responded to any of my emails and to Andy Harris he confirmed he would keep 30% of the purchase price of the apartment (which was correct) if I didn’t complete within 30 days of his alleged notice. I said I wouldn’t complete as the works had not been finished in accordance with the contract and therefore no valid notice was ever served. As I pointed out to him, it would be like paying for a house with a conservatory and no conservatory being built but the developer wanting their money and then saying to you it would be done within 2 years. You just wouldn’t complete!

Philip Harris said that he didn’t think that Andy Harris had ever served a notice or it could be described loosely as a notice (it either is or isn’t a notice in my opinion). I said I would not complete as the apartment had not been finished and the works completed in accordance with the contract.

I was extremely concerned about the money I had already paid (circa £32,000) and therefore took the decision to complete the purchase of the apartment by paying the rest of the money (£9,500) as it would be better having a flat which I would at least sell straight away rather than lose 30% of money (circa £12,500).

I sent Andy a number of emails confirming I would complete but all of these were ignored by him and therefore he knows he’sdoing wrong as he recently suggested that he would use my money he was holding as a deposit for another flat (6 months later) if I bought another flat in a different development. Why would I want to do that and give him the opportunity to keep even more of my money?

He would not let me complete my apartment although I didn’t want to as it wasn’t finished and would keep the money I had paid. He then said as I hadn’t completed he’d keep my deposit and that’s exactly what he has done although he knows he’s in the wrong.

I have sent him numerous emails trying to resolve this matter but he is not interested as he’s got my money and he’s still got his apartment. Which no doubt he’s probably sold to someone else.

I have lots and lots of proof but I have been told by another UK solicitor that I would need a solicitor in Egypt to review and act on my behalf and it would be very hard to get any money back. I would in all likelihood be throwing good money after bad.

I’ve looked on the web and found various articles relating to Property Hotspots Worldwide and how they conduct themselves and how they like to do business for themselves.

See for yourself what they are like

Corruption
Violence against Egyptians
Trying to sell properties twice
Letting properties and not paying the owners money

http://propertyhotspotshurghadaegypt.blogspot.com/

It does not make pleasant reading and it would appear that they have caused a lot of problems in Egypt and in England before they left.

Alison and Andy Harris will offer you what ever you want to want to hear as long as you pay them your money but will not deliver what you agreed. A contract is there as proof and is a legally binding document between parties but I don’t quite think Andy Harris and Property Hotspots think this is the case, as they are in Egypt and seem to do exactly what they want to do in flagrant disregard of both the law and what was agreed.

This is my story in brief.

If you have experienced any problems please click on the link to email me.

regards



Egypt Investigation

ANDREW JOHN HARRIS / ALISON HARRIS / PROPERTY HOTSPOTS – FIRST LEISURE, LTD. / MAM INVESTMENTS, LTD. HAVE RESOLD A NUMBER OF PROPERTIES WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OR GRANTED PERMISSION OF THE ORIGINAL PURCHASERS.

ANDREW JOHN HARRIS / ALISON HARRIS / PROPERTY HOTSPOTS – FIRST LEISURE, LTD. / MAM INVESTMENTS, LTD. RESOLD THE ORIGINAL BUYERS PROPERTIES AT A SUBSTANTIAL, AND VERY LARGE INCREASE IN PROFIT FROM THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTED SALE TO THE FIRST BUYERS.

A. ANDREW JOHN HARRIS / ALISON HARRIS / PROPERTY HOTSPOTS – FIRST LEISURE, LTD. / MAM INVESTMENTS, LTD. HAVE ENGAGED IN ILLEGAL ACTS OF SELLING CONTRACTED PROPERTIES WITHOUT PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE OF ORIGINAL BUYERS ACCORDING TO EGYPTIAN LAW.

B. ANDREW JOHN HARRIS / ALISON HARRIS / PROPERTY HOTSPOTS – FIRST LEISURE, LTD. / MAM INVESTMENTS, LTD. HAVE RETAINED ALL PROCEEDS FROM THE ORIGINAL SALES, AND THE LARGE PROFITS FROM THE SUBSEQUENT ILLEGAL SECOND SALES.

THIS IS INFACT “DOUBLE SELLING” UNDER OUR EGYPTIAN LAW. THIS IS THE BREAKING OF TWO SERIOUS LAWS HERE IN EGYPT. THE PENALTIES ARE SEVERE AND WILL BE PURSUED AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL THAT THE EGYPTIAN LAW WILL ALLOW FOR SUCH OFFENSES.

THIS IS NOW BEING TAKEN TO THE EGYPTIAN COURTS INVOLVING A LARGE NUMBER OF INVESTORS IN A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST ANDREW HARRIS / ALISON HARRIS / PROPERTY HOTSPOTS WORLDWIDE – FIRST LEISURE, LTD. / MAM INVESTMENTS, LTD.

ANDREW JOHN HARRIS / ALISON HARRIS / PROPERTY HOTSPOTS WORLDWIDE – FIRST LEISURE, LTD. / MAM INVESTMENTS, LTD. WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE IN EGYPT FOR THESE ILLEGAL TRANSACTIONS. WE ARE VERY CONFIDENT OF THE JUDGES / COURTS FINDINGS / ORDERS AND OUTCOME.

Advertisements



REPORT THIS AD



REPORT THIS AD

Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: adrew harris DTI investigation shut down by British government, alison harris, alison harris PHW is held by Egyptian police for crimes, Alison harris PHW police investigation, alison harris PHW property hotspots worldwide questioned for fraud in hurghada, alison harris property scam, andrew harris, andrew harris PHW investigated for violence in hurghada, andrew harris investigation by police hurghada egypt, andrew harris PHW banktrupcy, andrew harris PHW double selling flats, andrew harris PHW police investigation, andrew harris property scam, andrew harris regency beach fraud, andrew harris somerville property scam shut down, andy harris, andy harris double selling apartments at regency towers hurghada, andy harris phillip morris LAW, andy harris PHW held by Egyptian police, andy harris PHW regency beach property fraud, andy harris PHW shut down in UK, andy harris police reports against him, dream leisure andy harris fraud, egypt, egypt red, El Kawser, first leisure andrew harris property fraud investigation, hurghada, hurghada apartments, hurghada estate agents, hurghada flats, hurghada homes, Mr.Andy Harris, phil morris andrew harris PHW property hotspots worldwide LAW, philip morris law andrew harris lawyer, phw, PHW fraud!, PHW hurghada property scams, PHW regency beach, PHW theft hurghada egypt, police reports in hurghada, property developer andrew harrs, property hot spots worldwide property scams, property hotspots property scams, property hotspots worldwide, property scam, real estate, red sea estate agents, red sea properties, red sea real estate, regency beach, regency beach hurghada, regency cairo, regency cairo andy harris property fraud, regency cairo hurghada, regency cairo. regency continental, regency continental hurghada, regency crash pads, regency heights, regency heights fraud andy harris PHW, regency heights hurghada, regency towers, regency towers hurghada, www.property-hotspots-worldwide.com

Comments: Comments Offon Story of an Investor Getting Scammed by Andrew and Alison Harris PHW Hurghada, Egypt

Warning Regency Beach, Regency Cairo, Regency Towers, Property Hotspots Worlwide Andrew Harris Hurghada, Egypt
2008

………this is a warning to anyone buying from Andrew and Alison Harris from MAM investments limited (formally know as Property Hotspots Worldwide)…. they are being investigated by the Egyptian police for selling properties to more than one buyer at a time.

Phil Morris LAW

Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: adrew harris DTI investigation shut down by British government, alison harris, alison harris PHW is held by Egyptian police for crimes, Alison harris PHW police investigation, alison harris PHW property hotspots worldwide questioned for fraud in hurghada, alison harris property scam, andrew harris, andrew harris PHW investigated for violence in hurghada, andrew harris investigation by police hurghada egypt, andrew harris PHW banktrupcy, andrew harris PHW double selling flats, andrew harris PHW police investigation, andrew harris property scam, andrew harris regency beach fraud, andrew harris somerville property scam shut down, andy harris, andy harris double selling apartments at regency towers hurghada, andy harris phillip morris LAW, andy harris PHW held by Egyptian police, andy harris PHW regency beach property fraud, andy harris PHW shut down in UK, andy harris police reports against him, dream leisure andy harris fraud, egypt, egypt red, El Kawser, first leisure andrew harris property fraud investigation, first leisure ltd, hurghada, mr. andy harris, Mr.Andy Harris, phil morris andrew harris PHW property hotspots worldwide LAW, Phil Morris LAW, philip morris law andrew harris lawyer, phw, PHW fraud!, PHW hurghada property scams, PHW regency beach, PHW theft hurghada egypt, police reports in hurghada, property developer andrew harrs, property hot spots worldwide property scams, property hotspots property scams, property hotspots worldwide, property scam, regency beach, regency beach hurghada, regency cairo, regency cairo andy harris property fraud, regency cairo. regency continental, regency crash pads, regency heights, regency heights fraud andy harris PHW, regency towers, www.property-hotspots-worldwide.com



Comments: Comments Offon Warning Regency Beach, Regency Cairo, Regency Towers, Property Hotspots Worlwide Andrew Harris Hurghada, Egypt

careful to all investors of property hotspots worldwide hurghada, egypt, red sea
2008

anyone thinking of investing or who has already made this mistake with andrew harris and his wife alison should take great precaution with these people. they are being checked now by the police for “double selling” properties. they have been in large trouble with others in hurghada, egypt. with many crimes they have been named in. it should be said they were disqualified for real estate fraud in the united kingdom. here is the proof of this.

http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk/ddi…i?P=1043020501

plus

see these web sites

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=9616 31


http://worldpropertynews.blogspot.com/2008/05/property-hotsp ots-worldwide-owners.html

www.propertyhotspotshurghadaegypt.blogspot.com

http://hurghadapropertyhotspotsworldwide.blogspot.com/


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13mrc2g62PU

they are having problems with “regency beach” “regency towers” “regency heights” ” regency continental”

these developers are in very big trouble with the police, and most everyones is getting there money back they have given andrew and alison. from PHW……..

be very careful with them………

they have a few estate agents trying to protect them so they do not lose all there commissions, they are telling everyone that everything is ok, and that the bad press is just from another developer/ this in not true!

check the links up top to see all the many people that are angry with andrew, alison and property hotspots worldwide.

Egypt Investigation View Post

ANDREW JOHN HARRIS / ALISON HARRIS / PROPERTY HOTSPOTS – FIRST LEISURE, LTD. / MAM INVESTMENTS, LTD. HAVE RESOLD A NUMBER OF PROPERTIES WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OR GRANTED PERMISSION OF THE ORIGINAL PURCHASERS.

ANDREW JOHN HARRIS / ALISON HARRIS / PROPERTY HOTSPOTS – FIRST LEISURE, LTD. / MAM INVESTMENTS, LTD. RESOLD THE ORIGINAL BUYERS PROPERTIES AT A SUBSTANTIAL, AND VERY LARGE INCREASE IN PROFIT FROM THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTED SALE TO THE FIRST BUYERS.

A. ANDREW JOHN HARRIS / ALISON HARRIS / PROPERTY HOTSPOTS – FIRST LEISURE, LTD. / MAM INVESTMENTS, LTD. HAVE ENGAGED IN ILLEGAL ACTS OF SELLING CONTRACTED PROPERTIES WITHOUT PERMISSION OR KNOWLEDGE OF ORIGINAL BUYERS ACCORDING TO EGYPTIAN LAW.

B. ANDREW JOHN HARRIS / ALISON HARRIS / PROPERTY HOTSPOTS – FIRST LEISURE, LTD. / MAM INVESTMENTS, LTD. HAVE RETAINED ALL PROCEEDS FROM THE ORIGINAL SALES, AND THE LARGE PROFITS FROM THE SUBSEQUENT ILLEGAL SECOND SALES.

THIS IS INFACT “DOUBLE SELLING” UNDER OUR EGYPTIAN LAW. THIS IS THE BREAKING OF TWO SERIOUS LAWS HERE IN EGYPT. THE PENALTIES ARE SEVERE AND WILL BE PURSUED AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL THAT THE EGYPTIAN LAW WILL ALLOW FOR SUCH OFFENSES.

THIS IS NOW BEING TAKEN TO THE EGYPTIAN COURTS INVOLVING A LARGE NUMBER OF INVESTORS IN A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST ANDREW HARRIS / ALISON HARRIS / PROPERTY HOTSPOTS WORLDWIDE – FIRST LEISURE, LTD. / MAM INVESTMENTS, LTD.

ANDREW JOHN HARRIS / ALISON HARRIS / PROPERTY HOTSPOTS WORLDWIDE – FIRST LEISURE, LTD. / MAM INVESTMENTS, LTD. WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE IN EGYPT FOR THESE ILLEGAL TRANSACTIONS. WE ARE VERY CONFIDENT OF THE JUDGES / COURTS FINDINGS / ORDERS AND OUTCOME.

Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: adrew harris DTI investigation shut down by British government, alison harris, alison harris PHW is held by Egyptian police for crimes, Alison harris PHW police investigation, alison harris PHW property hotspots worldwide questioned for fraud in hurghada, alison harris property scam, andrew harris, andrew harris PHW investigated for violence in hurghada, andrew harris investigation by police hurghada egypt, andrew harris PHW banktrupcy, andrew harris PHW double selling flats, andrew harris PHW police investigation, andrew harris property scam, andrew harris regency beach fraud, andrew harris somerville property scam shut down, andy harris, andy harris double selling apartments at regency towers hurghada, andy harris phillip morris LAW, andy harris PHW held by Egyptian police, andy harris PHW regency beach property fraud, andy harris PHW shut down in UK, andy harris police reports against him, dream leisure andy harris fraud, egypt, egypt red, first leisure andrew harris property fraud investigation, hurghada, phil morris andrew harris PHW property hotspots worldwide LAW, philip morris law andrew harris lawyer, phw, PHW fraud!, PHW hurghada property scams, PHW theft hurghada egypt, police reports in hurghada, property developer andrew harrs, property hot spots worldwide property scams, property hotspots property scams, property hotspots worldwide, property scam, regency beach, regency cairo, regency cairo andy harris property fraud, regency cairo. regency continental, regency crash pads, regency heights, regency heights fraud andy harris PHW, regency towers, www.property-hotspots-worldwide.com

Source: https://badbusinessinegypt.wordpress.com/tag/phil-morris-andrew-harris-phw-property-hotspots-worldwide-law/


To lodge a complaint contact: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk

Desert Pearl A British Fraud 6

Ombudsman imposes a further 6 weeks delay in lodging complaint fully aware the legal firm (Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd / Company Number 05938236 / based 3-4 The Ashlane Centre, Worcester Road, Kidderminster, Worcestershire, DY10 1JR had refused to communicate with their client.

This decision by the LO would subsequently have a detrimental affect on the time limit allotted to the complaint. All conclusive evidence presented by the injured party was ruled outside of the LO time limit policy guidelines imposed. The Legal Ombudsman office ignored the fact that a criminal investigation was ongoing from the period of 2009 onward. Suggestions by LO carried clear bias in that the injured party act to undermine a criminal investigation by present the legal firm LAWL with a copy of compliant lodged with (An Garda Police Service of Ireland) which arrived in West Mercia Police Service via Interpol. The Ombudsman ignores the jurisdictional boundaries between Ireland and Britain, he further choose to ignore criminal investigative rules with such a suggestion. The LO office was fully aware that in accordance with European Law to present such information to the legal firm was not only dangerous but would act to undermine the investigation underway. Such suggestion by the LO office would have exposed the Irish citizen to harm and possible prosecution. The Legal Ombudsman principles was "to provide a legal service and claims management in a fair and independent way" were exposed by such a suggestion. The Irish citizen was treated as a British citizen and no emphasizes or credence was ever given over by the LO office to the fact (the injured part was Irish and not British) (the injured party lived in a different jurisdiction therefore should have been exempt from a timeline that caused further delays by the LO office 6 week policy). Delays in communication and unwillingness to acknowledge a criminal investigation was underway by British Police Services raised a question of great concern. (Does the Legal Ombudsman of the UK have the legal right to request a complaint ant interfere with the legal processes when a criminal investigation is underway?) In time it would be proven that the LO acted unfairly in supporting Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd. The main reason given by the legal firm for refusing to communicate with their Irish client (with the firm being supported by the Legal Ombudsman UK) was the Irish citizen had accused the legal firm of theft. It was later established that the legal firm had refused to communicated for their own reason thus running down the time limited afforded to lodge a complaint with the Legal Ombudsman office. Herein lies the issue of knowledge of the law. The UK Legal Ombudsman office were aware that an Irish citizen could not possible know the protocol or time limits which the LO office functioned under. Whereas the legal firm did. The Ombudsman punishes the Irish citizen with a timeline and refuses to acknowledge the fact that the reason the legal firm have given for grounds upon which they refused to communicate with their client was unfounded. Read below: Dear Mr McLoughlin I have not seen or been given a copy of your statement to the Republic of Ireland police. The choice of words was not mine but rather our local police when they paid a visit to follow up your referral. It would seem there has been a breakdown in communication. I hope the information sent to you helps to clarify whatever your enquiry was in your statement to the police. I have kept the police informed of the position. Yours faithfully, P.S.G. Morris Solicitor and Managing Director Legal Alliances Worldwide Solicitors 3-4 The Ash Lane Centre Worcester Road Kidderminster Worcestershire DY10 1JR United Kingdom Branch SRA Nos. 447321 Tel: 0044 (0)1562 756830-9 Fax: 0044 (0)1562 750908 Skype: philip.morris11 E-mail - philip.morris@lawlimited.co.uk What is astonishing is that the independence and fairness the LO office UK to claim to function under are completely exposed. Above the legal firm give the poor excuse that they had an indifference with the local police and this was grounds enough for the firm to punish their Irish client whom had nothing whatsoever to do with the third party conversation. From 2009 the legal firm refuses to communicate with their client, ignoring their attempts to address issues. Yet the Legal Ombudsman office in the their investigation of 2011-12 state in their findings that the Irish citizens knew that the legal firm were not acting on their behalf as far back as 2009. Not once does the LO office acknowledge that the reason behind the legal firms bizarre behavior was twofold (1) it ran down the clock so any complaint would be unsuccessful This was supported by LO decision in 2011-12 and (2) the legal firm had advantage in knowing UK law whereas the Irish citizens did not. The legal Ombudsman rules in the favor of the legal firm in 2011-12 and punish the Irish citizen...

Solicitor Regulatory Authority refuses to act.


To lodge a complaint contact: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk

Desert Pearl A British Fraud 5

Legal Ombudsman Office UK cannot obtain a response form the Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd. They are forced to contact the Solicitor Regulatory Authority UK to request if this body can send a letter to the firm.

Again the Irish citizen is exposed to delays by the LAWL which the Ombudsman refuse to acknowledge. Furthermore what is quite shocking is the fact that in the investigation of March 29th 2012 carried out by the Legal Ombudsman office the late submission by the legal firm favorable. The early submission of conclusive evidence submitted by the complaint ant is ruled outside of the Legal Ombudsman time limits in handling such cases. It is quite clear the the legal firm delayed their replies to the Ombudsman's. Therefore the LO chased them up to gather information to defend the solicitor. As the solicitor in question was made aware of the complaint it was not for the Legal Ombudsman office to chase him down. Had solicitor not responded, without being chased down by the LO office, the Irish clients would have won their case. It appeared the independent and fair Legal Ombudsman Office intervened to obtain a response were one was not forthcoming initially. This action of intervening forced the legal firm to respond. No such common courtesy was afforded to the Irish victim when information presented to the investigator of the 2011-12 investigation carried out by the LO office was mysteriously removed from the investigation. See https://youtu.be/EZumQK6R3kI Information presented in contact details and the full Denton report to investigators at the Legal Ombudsman offices UK were: (1) Ignored (2) Hidden (3) Seen as unlawful. No reason from the Legal Ombudsman office was ever received as to why Denton report was removed from the investigation, yet all the legal firms late submissions was accepted and ruled upon in the firms favor. The legal refused to present the clients due diligence with the Legal Ombudsman of the UK claiming that the firm did not have to produce the conveyance report because it was the firms property. The Ombudsman claimed the legal firm carried out the due diligence before the clients set about purchasing their property on DP1. What was most notable was that the legal firm had been paid in full for all legal fees and disbursements and yet they were being denied a copy of their due diligence report. The Legal Ombudsman suggests the Irish clients pay the legal firm more money to obtain their legal right and entitlement to the documentation they had already paid for in full. So much for independence and fairness principles. The Legal Ombudsman office again punish the Irish citizens in their investigation of 29th March 2012 by siding with the legal firm whom refuses to produce a copy of the clients due diligence for examination by all concerned. What became clear was that both the legal firm and the Legal Ombudsman office UK refused to deal or suppressed any information dealing with any information surrounding the right to title of the land known as Desert Pearl One. This is critical. In the contract of 8th May 2008 the legal firm forwarded their Irish clients the contract of purchase. In this contract the solicitor and sole owner states that the land DP1 is freehold. Therefore it had no liens or mortgage on the land. However the Legal Ombudsman along with the Solicitor Regulatory Authority UK refuse to accept the Denton Widle Sapte Report of June 2009 undertaken by parties on the ground in Egypt. The report outlines the fact that a mortgage exists on the land called DP1 in favor of the Bank of Abu Dhabi for 25 million Egyptian pounds. The Legal Ombudsman and Ms Dicicco refuse to acknowledge information presented on the land issue to the investigator. Ms Kate Dicicco had already made her mind up before the findings were presented on the 29th March 2012. She state "I will still be including my view that some of your complaints are out of time but I will also try to give a view on the poor service complaints of where possible". What was clear was the the Legal Ombudsman UK had preempted the outcome of the investigation based on the time limited they imposed not once taking into account the legal firm actions delaying for time and submitting information only because the LO office had contacted the SRA. This is clear case of Discrimination towards Irish citizens in favour supporting a senior British solicitor and it judicial system.


To lodge a complaint contact: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk

Desert Pearl A British Fraud 4

Peter Morris of WWD/UK Egypt shows odd behavior towards his clients. This behavior opens up more questions to why these files relating to WWD-UK/ Egypt have been withheld.

P Offices of Grant Thornton clearly indicate they sold the files to Mr Peter Morris whom denies their client access, telling them to contact the office of Grant Thornton knowing full well the files are in his possession.

The QUESTION IS WHY DID PETER MORRIS DO THIS?

To lodge a complaint contact: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk

Desert Pearl A British Fraud 1

Both the Legal Ombudsman and Solicitor Regulatory Authority of the UK refuse to acknowledge the legal authority of The Companies House UK deceleration presented. Both parties ultimate ignore the UK companies laws.

Details of the misdirected payments code made under the name Desert Pearl Resort Ltd is not acknowledged and is refuted. by the Legal Ombudsman of UK: His office states that it investigated Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd in their 2011-12. Please note no mention of LAWL account ledger details were never discussed in the investigation of 29th March 2012 by LO. As we shall in later videos. . In 2017 LO claims he had examined the legal firms account details in 2012 The report of 2011-12 account number to the company refereed to as Legal Alliances Worldwide is never disclosed. In 2017 the Legal Ombudsman Office states, it will re-investigate the case on foot of note new information disclosed, The new information discloses by law both Worldwide Destinations Ltd and Desert Pearl Resort Ltd are seen as separate companies. Therefore the clients contract was with WWD and their 100% monies forwarded to the legal firm is transfered into the account of DPRL. No re-investigation ever take place in 2017. Information released to the Legal Ombudsman in 2017 is refuted as being part of the original investigation of 2011-12. It was made clear to the Legal Ombudsman that this could never have occurred. As the information establishing that both WWD and DPRL were separate companies was established after 2011-12 investigation. The complaint ants in the 2011-12 investigation had highlight the fact that the legal firm LAWL was withhold information from their clients but the Ombudsman would not follow up on any requests made to have disclosure take place. The legal firm knew the law and what they could get away with and the Legal Ombudsman Office supports the firms obstruction fro obtaining the facts such as the separate company account details. Therefore it quite simple the LO could not have examined the account to LAWL in 2011-12 without acknowledging the DPRL account. If the LO did examine the legal firms accounts at a later stage as the claim to have done so in 2017, they are guilty of withholding the fact that the Irish clients monies was transferred into DPRL account against their wishes. The fact that Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd forwarded their clients monies to an account of DPRL at Lloyds TSB in Birmingham is a serious matter and concern. Why because Worldwide Destinations Ltd had enter into receivership since 4th June 2008. Therefore it is illegal for monies to misappropriated to the account of a company the client does not have a contract with, implied or otherwise. In 2010 the Solicitor Regulatory Authority claim to have investigated the accounts of the company known as Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd. The SRA claim that the accounts of the legal firm were in order. However the SRA refuses to disclose its report of 2010. Why maybe the answer is because the SRA claim they investigated the accounts expose them ridicule and error. Had the SRA investigated the firms accounts in 2010 as intimated by Mr David Clare he would have clearly seen monies released into the account of the company known as Desert Pearl Resort Ltd. As the clients have informed the SRA in a full report outlying this anomaly the investigator refused to respond to the fact that no contract ever existed between the legal firms client and Desert Pearl Resort Ltd. When Mr Clare came under pressure to prove answers to this anomaly he simply claimed that the complaint ant was seeking legal advice. It was quite clear that the accounts which Mr Clare states were examined in 2010 held by the legal firm LAWL is not true according to the legal firm (most notably LAWL account ledger) show payments went out on the 15/08/2008 to DPRL. The SRA of the UK refuse to give justice to the Irish complaint ants. They to rule in favor of LAWL. Please note in 2010 both the Legal Ombudsman office and SRA were in effected one. the separation of both bodies leads to questions that both bodies refuse to answer.


To lodge a complaint contact: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk