Details of the misdirected payments code made under the name Desert Pearl Resort Ltd is not acknowledged and is refuted. by the Legal Ombudsman of UK: His office states that it investigated Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd in their 2011-12.
Please note no mention of LAWL account ledger details were never discussed in the investigation of 29th March 2012 by LO.
As we shall in later videos. .
In 2017 LO claims he had examined the legal firms account details in 2012
The report of 2011-12 account number to the company refereed to as Legal Alliances Worldwide is never disclosed. In 2017 the Legal Ombudsman Office states, it will re-investigate the case on foot of note new information disclosed, The new information discloses by law both Worldwide Destinations Ltd and Desert Pearl Resort Ltd are seen as separate companies. Therefore the clients contract was with WWD and their 100% monies forwarded to the legal firm is transfered into the account of DPRL.
No re-investigation ever take place in 2017.
Information released to the Legal Ombudsman in 2017 is refuted as being part of the original investigation of 2011-12.
It was made clear to the Legal Ombudsman that this could never have occurred. As the information establishing that both WWD and DPRL were separate companies was established after 2011-12 investigation.
The complaint ants in the 2011-12 investigation had highlight the fact that the legal firm LAWL was withhold information from their clients but the Ombudsman would not follow up on any requests made to have disclosure take place. The legal firm knew the law and what they could get away with and the Legal Ombudsman Office supports the firms obstruction fro obtaining the facts such as the separate company account details.
Therefore it quite simple the LO could not have examined the account to LAWL in 2011-12 without acknowledging the DPRL account. If the LO did examine the legal firms accounts at a later stage as the claim to have done so in 2017, they are guilty of withholding the fact that the Irish clients monies was transferred into DPRL account against their wishes. The fact that Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd forwarded their clients monies to an account of DPRL at Lloyds TSB in Birmingham is a serious matter and concern. Why because Worldwide Destinations Ltd had enter into receivership since 4th June 2008.
Therefore it is illegal for monies to misappropriated to the account of a company the client does not have a contract with, implied or otherwise.
In 2010 the Solicitor Regulatory Authority claim to have investigated the accounts of the company known as Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd. The SRA claim that the accounts of the legal firm were in order.
However the SRA refuses to disclose its report of 2010.
Why maybe the answer is because the SRA claim they investigated the accounts expose them ridicule and error.
Had the SRA investigated the firms accounts in 2010 as intimated by Mr David Clare he would have clearly seen monies released into the account of the company known as Desert Pearl Resort Ltd.
As the clients have informed the SRA in a full report outlying this anomaly the investigator refused to respond to the fact that no contract ever existed between the legal firms client and Desert Pearl Resort Ltd.
When Mr Clare came under pressure to prove answers to this anomaly he simply claimed that the complaint ant was seeking legal advice. It was quite clear that the accounts which Mr Clare states were examined in 2010 held by the legal firm LAWL is not true according to the legal firm (most notably LAWL account ledger) show payments went out on the 15/08/2008 to DPRL. The SRA of the UK refuse to give justice to the Irish complaint ants. They to rule in favor of LAWL.
Please note in 2010 both the Legal Ombudsman office and SRA were in effected one. the separation of both bodies leads to questions that both bodies refuse to answer.
To lodge a complaint contact: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk
To lodge a complaint contact: enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk
No comments:
Post a Comment