Legal Ombudsman first priority had to be to clear the cases which had built up.
No justice for the victims of Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd. SRA assist LO when requested but legal firm cannot be contacted but eventually submits a small proportion of information late to the investigation. This small proportion of information is a judged to be significant enough to rule in the firms favor. All conclusive evidence submitted by the complaint ant is ruled out side of time.
Although the complaint ants submit their evidence before the legal firm to the investigation they are exposed by LO priority. Legal firm LAWL withholds/hides quite a number of sensitive documentation that exposes the firms poor behavior. However the LO priority is not acquire the sensitive documentation, in the name of justice, first priority is to remove the build up of cases.
LO rules in legal firms favour and apportions blame on the victims. The investigation of 29th March 2012 is a waste of time and the applet process was further hampered when the investigator Mr Kate Dicicco / Lunn is no longer available to address her findings or report on why she removed said documentation most notable Denton Wilde Sapte Report of June 2009 a due diligence which accounted for conclusive evidence the legal firm had mislead their client.
The Legal firms contract of 8th May 2008 was exposed by Denton Report which reported a mortgage had been established on the land known as Desert Pearl One, in Hurghada Egypt. Legal Alliances Worldwide Ltd contract of 8th of May was exposed, as DP1 was not freehold as the firm had claimed in their initial introduction to their clients the Mc Loughlin.
Legal Ombudsman removes Denton form their investigation of 29th March 2012 and still refuse to confirm to this day that a mortgage exists on the land known as Desert Pearl One with the Bank of Abu Dhabi in London. Legal Ombudsman is well aware he and he alone is responsible for his actions. British authorities such as the Solicitor Regulatory Authority also refuse to adhere to the request.
The Irish clients become victims for a second time.
Any updates on DP1? Was there any justice? It still makes me sick that I can see people living in my apartment.
ReplyDeleteApologies. No is the short answer. We have records showing the office of Grant Thornton UK had clients of Desert Pearl One, monies forwarded to an account Desert Pearl Resort Ltd. Which under UK law was an entirely different company to Worldwide Destinations Ltd. The disclose of these large sums of money in GT accounts are never presented to police authorizes in the UK upon investigation into WWD. In short although people purchased the apartments in Egypt. It appears the money never arrived therefore no one could claim rightful ownership. The office of Grant Thornton have refused to divulge the whereabouts of the large sums of monies received into their accounts before WWD was to liquidated. Any assist in gaining access to these archival records now would disclose the facts surrounding unlawful money transfers.
ReplyDeleteHi. I lost over £30,000 on a one bed apartment. I owned it for 6 months. It was legally handed over to me . I stayed in it twice...I had bought the £5,000 furniture pack too. Then on my 3rd visit El Road ha d changed the locks and reclaimed it without any warning or notification..
ReplyDeleteDisgusting..I paid two solicitors to fight...they got nowhere and were probably all crooks too. I lost my pension pot and was scared for life. Never got any justice at all.